You're viewing Apigee Edge documentation.
Go to the
Apigee X documentation. info
InvalidNameForAdditionalClaim
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid name for additional claim : policy(policy_name) claim(claim_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid name for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(iss).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the name of the claim used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
element is one of the following registered names:
"kid", "iss", "sub", "aud", "iat", "exp", "nbf", "jti"
The registered claims are specified in RFC7519.
For example, using the claim name iss
under the <AdditionalClaims>
element will result in this error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and claim name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the claim name isiss
:Invalid name for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(iss).
Verify that the claim name used under the
<AdditionalClaims>
element in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the claim name identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the claim asiss
, which matches what's in the error message:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name="iss"/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
If the claim name used in the child element
<Claim>
of the<AdditionalClaims>
element is one of the following registered names:"kid", "iss", "sub", "aud", "iat", "exp", "nbf", "jti"
then that's the cause of the error.
In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<Claim>
name is specified asiss
under the<AdditionalClaims>
element, resulting in the error:Invalid name for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(iss).
Resolution
Do not use any of the registered names "kid", "iss", "sub", "aud", "iat", "exp", "nbf" or "jti" in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
element.
To correct the issue with the example Verify JWT policy, change the claim name to status
:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalClaims>
<Claim name='status' type='string'>Development</Claim>
</AdditionalClaims>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidTypeForAdditionalClaim
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid type for additional claim : policy(policy_name) claim(claim_name) type(type_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid type for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim) type(integer).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
The type of the claim used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
element of the VerifyJWT policy is not one of the following types:
string
(default), number
, boolean
, or map
For example, using the claim type integer
under the <AdditionalClaims>
element will result in the error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy, the claim name and the type from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
, the claim name isclaim
, and the type isinteger:
Invalid type for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim) type(integer).
Verify that the claim name and the type used under the
<AdditionalClaims>
element in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the claim name and type identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the claim asclaim
and the type asinteger
, which matches what's in the error message:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='integer'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
If the claim type used in the child element
<Claim>
of the<AdditionalClaims>
element is not one of the following types:string
(default),number
,boolean
, ormap
then that's the cause of the error.
In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<Claim>
type is specified asinteger
under the<AdditionalClaims>
element. Becauseinteger
is not a supported type, you get the error:Invalid type for additional claim : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim) type(integer).
Resolution
Ensure that only the supported data types string
(default), number
, boolean
, or map
are used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
element.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, change the claim type to boolean
:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalClaims>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='boolean'/>
</AdditionalClaims>
</VerifyJWT>
MissingNameForAdditionalClaim
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Error occurred while validation of bean(policy_name.xml) Reason: - Required attribute name is missing in Claim.
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Error occurred while validation of bean JWT-Verify-RS256.xml. Reason: - Required attribute name is missing in Claim
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the name of the claim is not specified in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
or <AdditionalHeaders>
element.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
:Error occurred while validation of bean JWT-Verify-RS256.xml. Reason: - Required attribute name is missing in Claim
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the claim name is missing in the child element
<Claims>
under the<AdditionalClaims>
or<AdditionalHeaders>
element. For example, the following Verify JWT policy does not specify the claim name under the<AdditionalClaims>
element:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim ref='reqclaim' type='boolean'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Because the
<Claim>
name is not specified under the<AdditionalClaims>
element you get the error:Error occurred while validation of bean JWT-Verify-RS256.xml. Reason: - Required attribute name is missing in Claim
Resolution
Ensure that the name of the claim is always specified in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
or <AdditionalHeaders>
element.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, specify the claim name as shown below:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalClaims>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='boolean'/>
</AdditionalClaims>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidNameForAdditionalHeader
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid name for additional header : policy(policy_name)header(header_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid name for additional header: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) header(alg).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the name of the claim used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalHeaders>
element is one of the following standard JWT headers:
alg
or typ
For example, using the claim name alg
under the <AdditionalHeaders>
element will cause the error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and header name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and header name isalg
:Invalid name for additional header: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) header(alg).
Verify that the header name used in the child element
<Claim>
under the<AdditionalHeaders>
element in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the header name identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the header asalg
, which matches what's in the error message:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalHeaders> <Claim name="alg"/> </AdditionalHeaders> </VerifyJWT>
If the header name used in the child element
<Claim>
of the<AdditionalClaims>
element is one of the following standard JWT headers:alg
ortyp
then that's the cause of the error.
In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<Claim>
name is specified asalg
under the<AdditionalClaims>
element, resulting in the error:Invalid name for additional header: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) header(alg).
Resolution
Do not use the standard JWT headers alg
or typ
in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalHeaders>
element.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, use the name x5c
in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalHeaders>
element:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='x5c'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidTypeForAdditionalHeader
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid type for additional header : policy(policy_name) claim(claim_name) type(type_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid type for additional header : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim1) type(integer).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
The error will occur if the type of claim used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalHeaders>
element of the Verify JWT policy is not one of the following types:
string
(default), number
, boolean
, or map
For example, using the claim type integer
under the <AdditionalHeaders>
element will cause the error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy, claim name and the type from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
, the claim name isclaim
and the type isinteger
:Invalid type for additional header : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim) type(integer).
Verify that the claim name and the type used under the
<AdditionalClaims>
element in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the claim name and type identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the claim asclaim
and the claim type asinteger,
which matches what's in the error message:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalHeaders> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='integer'/> </AdditionalHeaders> </VerifyJWT>
If the claim type used in the child element
<Claim>
of the<AdditionalHeaders>
element is not one of the following types:string
(default),number
,boolean
, ormap
then that's the cause of the error.
In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<Claim>
type under the<AdditionalHeaders>
element is specified asinteger
. Becauseinteger
is not a supported type, you get the error:Invalid type for additional header : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim) type(integer).
Resolution
Ensure that only the supported data types string
, number
, boolean
, or map
are used in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalHeaders>
element.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, change the claim type to boolean
:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='boolean'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidValueOfArrayAttribute
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid value for array attribute: policy(policy_name)claim(claim_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid value for array attribute: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the value of the array attribute in the in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
or <AdditionalHeaders>
element is not set to true
or false
.
For example, setting the value of the array attribute as yes
in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
or <AdditionalHeaders>
element causes the error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and claim name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and claim name isclaim
:Invalid value for array attribute: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim).
Verify that the claim name used in the child element
<Claim>
under the<AdditionalHeaders>
element in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the claim name identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the claim name asclaim
, which matches what's in the error message:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='yes'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
If the value of the
array
attribute in the child element<Claim>
of the<AdditionalClaims>
element is not set totrue
orfalse
, then that's the cause of the error.Because the
array
attribute in the child element<Claim>
of the<AdditionalClaims>
element is set toyes
in the example above, you get the error:Invalid value for array attribute: policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) claim(claim).
Resolution
Ensure that the value of the array attribute in the child element <Claim>
of the <AdditionalClaims>
or <AdditionalHeaders>
elements is set to true
or false
.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy shown above, change the value of array attribute to true
:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidValueForElement
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision Invalid Value for element : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision
Invalid Value for element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(Algorithm).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the value specified in the <Algorithm>
element is not one of the following values:
HS256
, HS384
, HS512
, RS256
, RS384
, RS512
For example, specifying the algorithm value as RS128
in the <Algorithm>
element leads to this error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and element name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the element name isAlgorithm
:Invalid Value for element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(Algorithm).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and check the value specified for the
<Algorithm>
element.Here's a sample Verify JWT policy:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS128</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id>1918290</Id> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='status' type='string'>Development</Claim> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Examine the value specified in the
<Algorithm>
element. If it is not one of the following values:HS256
,HS384
,HS512
,RS256
,RS384
,RS512
then that's the cause of the error.
In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<Algorithm>
name is specified asHS128
. Because this is not a supported algorithm, you get the error:Invalid Value for element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(Algorithm).
Resolution
Ensure that the value specified in the <Algorithm>
element is one of the supported values:
HS256
, HS384
, HS512
, RS256
, RS384
, RS512
To correct the example Verify JWT policy shown above, which uses the <SecretKey>
element, change the value of the <Algorithm>
to HS25
. Note, when the <SecretKey>
element is used, you can only use HS Family algorithms.
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
<Id>1918290</Id>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalClaims>
<Claim name='status' type='string'>Development</Claim>
</AdditionalClaims>
</VerifyJWT>
MissingConfigurationElement
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision Missing configuration element : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision
Missing configuration element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs when the <PublicKey>
element is not used with RSA Family algorithms in the Verify JWT policy. Likewise, the error can occur if the <SecretKey>
element is not used with HS Family algorithms in the Verify JWT policy.
For example, not using the <PublicKey>
element with RSA Family algorithms leads to this error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and missing element name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the missing element name isPublicKey
:Missing configuration element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the element indicated in the error message is missing. If it is missing, then that's the cause of the error.
For example, the following policy shows that the
PublicKey
is missing and theAlgorithm
used isRS256
:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
The example Verify JWT policy uses HS Family algorithms, but the mandatory element
PublicKey
is missing, resulting in the error:Missing configuration element : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey).
Resolution
Ensure that the mandatory <PublicKey>
element is used with RSA Family algorithms and the mandatory <SecretKey>
element is used with HS Family algorithms.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy shown above, which uses the RS256 algorithm, add the <PublicKey>
element to the VerifyJWT policy:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<PublicKey>
<Value ref="public.publickey"/>
</PublicKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidKeyConfiguration
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving RevisionInvalid Key configuration : policy(policy_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid Key configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the child element <Value>
or the mandatory child element <JWKS>
is not defined in the <PublicKey>
or <SecretKey>
elements of the Verify JWT policy.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
:Invalid Key configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify if the child element
<Value>
or the child element<JWKS>
is not defined in the<PublicKey>
or<SecretKey>
elements. If the child element is not defined, then that's the cause of the error.For example, the following policy shows that the child element
<Value>
or<JWKS>
is not defined in the<PublicKey>
element:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <PublicKey> </PublicKey> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Because the child element
<Value>
or<JWKS>
is not defined in the<PublicKey>
element of the Verify JWT policy, you get the error:Invalid Key configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256).
Resolution
Ensure that the child element <Value>
or <JWKS>
is always defined in the <PublicKey>
element of the Verify JWT policy.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, define the child element <Value>
or <JWKS>
under the <PublicKey>
element as shown below:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<PublicKey>
<Value ref="public.publickey"/>
</PublicKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</PublicJWT>
EmptyElementForKeyConfiguration
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Empty Element for Key Configuration : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Empty Element for Key Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/Value).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the ref attribute in the child element <Value>
or <JWKS>
of the <PublicKey>
element is not specified or empty.
For example, if the child element <Value>
of the <PublicKey>
element is empty, then the error occurs.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and element name which is empty from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the element name isPublicKey/Value
:Empty Element for Key Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/Value).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the element identified in Step 1 is empty. If it is empty, then that's the cause of the error.
For example, the following policy shows that the child element
<Value>
of the<PublicKey>
element is empty:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <PublicKey> <Value/> </PublicKey> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Because the child element
<Value>
of the<PublicKey>
element of the Verify JWT policy is empty, you get the error:Empty Element for Key Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/Value).
Resolution
Ensure that the ref attribute in the child element <Value>
or <JWKS>
of the <PublicKey>
element is always specified.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, use the flow variable public.publickey
in the child element <Value>
of the <PublicKey>
element:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<PublicKey>
<Value ref="public.publickey"/>
</PublicKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidConfigurationForVerify
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid configuration element for verify : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 3
Invalid configuration element for verify : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(SecretKey/Id).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the element <Id>
is defined within the <SecretKey>
element of a VerifyJWT policy.
For example, if the element <Id>
is defined in the <SecretKey>
element, this error occurs.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and the invalid element name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the element name isSecretKey/Id
:Invalid configuration element for verify : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(SecretKey/Id)
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the invalid element identified in Step 1 is defined. If it is defined, then that's the cause of the error.
For example, the following policy shows that the child element
<Id>
of the<SecretKey>
element is defined:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> <Id/> </SecretKey> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Because the element
<Id>
is defined within the<SecretKey>
element of the Verify JWT policy, you get the error:Invalid configuration element for verify : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(SecretKey/Id)
Resolution
Ensure that the element <Id>
is never defined within the <SecretKey>
element of a Verify JWT policy.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, remove the child element <Id>
from the <SecretKey>
element:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref='private.secretkey'/>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidEmptyElement
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving RevisionInvalid empty element : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 3
Invalid empty element : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(Source).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the <Source>
element of the Verify JWT policy is empty. If present, it must be defined with an Edge flow variable name.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and the empty element name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the element name isPublicKey/Value
:Invalid empty element : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(Source).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the element identified in Step 1 is empty. If it is empty, then that's the cause of the error.
For example, the following policy shows that the element
<Source>
is empty:<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Source></Source> <PublicKey> <Value ref="public.publickey"/> </PublicKey> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> <AdditionalClaims> <Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/> </AdditionalClaims> </VerifyJWT>
Because the
<Source>
element of the Verify JWT policy is empty, you get the error:Invalid empty element : policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(Source).
Resolution
If the <Source>
element of a Verify JWT policy is present, ensure that it specifies a flow variable.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, use a valid flow variable in the <Source>
element:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<Source>jwt-variable</Source>
<PublicKey>
<Value ref="public.publickey"/>
</PublicKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
<AdditionalHeaders>
<Claim name='claim' ref='reqclaim' type='string' array='true'/>
</AdditionalHeaders>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidPublicKeyValue
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision revision_number Invalid Public Key Value in Configuration : policy(policy_name) element(element_name).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision 2
Invalid Public Key Value in Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/JWKS).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the value used in the child element <JWKS>
of the <PublicKey>
element is not in a valid format as specified in RFC 7517.
For example, using abc
as the value of the child element <JWKS>
under the <PublicKey>
element will lead to this error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy and element name containing an invalid value from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-RS256
and the element isPublicKey/JWKS
:Invalid Public Key Value in Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/JWKS).
Examine the failed Verify JWT policy XML and verify that the element identified in Step 1 contains a value in a valid format as per RFC 7517. If the value of the element is not in valid format, then that's the cause of the error.
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <PublicKey> <JWKS>abc<JWKS> </PublicKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> <Id/> </VerifyJWT>
Because the value in the child element
<JWKS>
of the<PublicKey>
element is not in a valid format per RFC 7517, you get the error:Invalid Public Key Value in Configuration : policy(JWT-Verify-RS256) element(PublicKey/JWKS).
Resolution
Ensure that the value specified in the child element <JWKS>
of the <PublicKey>
element is a valid string or flow variable in a valid JWKS format (RFC 7517).
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, change the value of <JWKS>
as shown below:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-RS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify RS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>RS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<PublicKey>
<JWKS>eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJ1c2VySWQiOiJiMDhmODZhZi0zNWRhLTQ4ZjItOGZhYi1jZWYzOTA0NjYwYmQifQ.-xN_h82PHVTCMA9vdoHrcZxH-x5mb11y1537t3rGzcM</JWKS>
</PublicKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
<Id/>
</VerifyJWT>
InvalidConfigurationForActionAndAlgorithm
Error message
Deployment of the API proxy through either the Edge UI or Edge management API fails with this error message:
Error Saving Revision <var>revision_number</var>
Invalid configuration element for this action and algorithm Family: policy(<var>policy_name</var>) element(<var>element_name</var>) action(<var>action_name</var>) family(<var>family_name</var>).
Example error message
Error Saving Revision
Invalid configuration element for this action and algorithm Family: policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(PublicKey) action(Verify) family(RSA).
Example screenshot
In the Edge UI, you will see a dialog box with an error:
Cause
This error occurs if the <PublicKey>
element is used with HS Family algorithms and the <SecretKey>
element is used with RSA Family algorithms. The error will also occur if either of these conditions are true.
For example, using the <PublicKey>
element with HS Family algorithms leads to this error.
Diagnosis
Identify the name of the Verify JWT policy, the element name and the algorithm family name from the error message. For example, in the following error message, the name of the Verify JWT policy is
JWT-Verify-HS256
, the element name isPublicKey
and the algorithm family isRSA
:Invalid configuration element for this action and algorithm Family: policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(PublicKey) action(Verify) family(RSA).
Verify that the element and the algorithm family used in the failed Verify JWT policy XML matches the element and the algorithm family identified in the error message in Step 1. For example, the following policy specifies the element as
PublicKey
and the algorithm family asHMAC
, which matches what's in the error message<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-HS256"> <DisplayName>JWT Verify HS256</DisplayName> <Algorithm>HS256</Algorithm> <IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables> <Source>request.formparam.jwt</Source> <PublicKey> <Value ref="var-value"/> </PublicKey> <SecretKey> <Value ref="private.secretkey"/> </SecretKey> <ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn> <Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject> <Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer> <Audience>fans</Audience> </VerifyJWT>
If the value of the
<Algorithm>
element isHS256
, but you have used<PublicKey>
then that's the cause of the error.In the example Verify JWT policy shown above, the
<PublicKey>
element is used even though the<Algorithm>
is set to a family algorithm HS256, resulting in the error:Invalid configuration element for this action and algorithm Family: policy(JWT-Verify-HS256) element(PublicKey) action(Verify) family(RSA).
Resolution
Ensure that the <PublicKey>
element is used only with RSA Family algorithms and the <SecretKey>
element is used only with HS Family algorithms.
To correct the example Verify JWT policy, use the <SecretKey>
from the VerifyJWT policy that uses the HS256 algorithm:
<VerifyJWT name="JWT-Verify-HS256">
<DisplayName>JWT Verify HS256</DisplayName>
<Algorithm>HS256</Algorithm>
<IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>false</IgnoreUnresolvedVariables>
<Source>request.formparam.jwt</Source>
<SecretKey>
<Value ref="private.secretkey"/>
</SecretKey>
<ExpiresIn>1h</ExpiresIn>
<Subject>monty-pythons-flying-circus</Subject>
<Issuer>urn://apigee-edge-JWT-policy-test</Issuer>
<Audience>fans</Audience>
</VerifyJWT>